Where do national accreditation boards of Architecture in Malaysia find guidance?

The national accreditation boards of Architecture in Malaysia, such as the Board of Architects Malaysia (Lembaga Arkitek Malaysia or LAM), typically find guidance from various sources to develop their accreditation standards and processes. Here are some common sources they may refer to:

1. National Laws and Regulations: Accreditation boards in Malaysia derive their authority and guidance from national laws and regulations related to architecture and higher education. These laws outline the requirements for architectural education and professional practice, and accreditation boards ensure that architecture programs comply with these standards.
2. Professional and Educational Associations: Accreditation boards often collaborate with professional and educational associations within the architecture field. These associations, such as the Malaysian Institute of Architects (Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia or PAM) and the Malaysian Architectural Education Association (MAEA), provide expertise and input regarding best practices in architectural education.
3. International Standards and Benchmarks: Accreditation boards may also refer to international standards and benchmarks in architectural education. They may align their accreditation criteria with established international organizations such as the Commonwealth Association of Architects (CAA), the International Union of Architects (UIA), or the International Association of Schools of Architecture (IASA).
4. Peer Consultation: Accreditation boards may engage in peer consultation and collaboration with other national accreditation boards or organizations responsible for architectural education in other countries. This allows them to share experiences, exchange knowledge, and learn from each other’s practices.
5. Self-Assessment and Evaluation: Accreditation boards often engage in self-assessment and evaluation processes to review and refine their accreditation standards. They may conduct internal reviews, seek feedback from stakeholders, and revise their criteria based on the changing needs of the architecture profession and the education sector.

It’s important to note that the specific sources of guidance may vary, and accreditation boards may develop their own unique approaches to accreditation based on the local context and requirements. For the most accurate and up-to-date information on the sources of guidance for national accreditation boards of Architecture in Malaysia, it is advisable to consult the specific accreditation board, such as Lembaga Arkitek Malaysia (LAM), directly.